Field Record / Anonymised

Case Studies.

Selected engagements from across our global practice. Client names, exact scopes, and identifying metadata are intentionally redacted — what remains is the work, the methodology, and the measurable outcome.

ENGAGEMENTS60+
SECTORS8
REGIONS12
AVG MTTR REDUCTION−72%

DISCLOSURE PROTOCOLEvery engagement Alexa undertakes is governed by a strict mutual NDA and, in regulated sectors, by sovereign disclosure rules. The narratives below have been anonymised, generalised across multiple clients of the same profile, and approved for release. Any resemblance to a single identifiable client is unintentional.

CASE_01
PARTIAL DISCLOSURE

Client Profile

Tier-1 Commercial Bank

Region

Southeast Asia

Duration

6 weeks

Scale

≈ 18M retail customers · 24,000 endpoints

Engagement

Red Team for IT — Assumed Breach

MITRE ATT&CKC2 InfrastructureAD / Entra ID AbusePurple Team Workshop

End-to-end emulation of a state-aligned threat actor against a regional retail bank.

Challenge

Internal audit and regulator both flagged a maturing-but-untested SOC. Leadership wanted irrefutable evidence of how a sophisticated actor would move from initial foothold to core banking systems — without disrupting live transactions.

Approach

Six-week TIBER-EU style operation: OSINT, spear-phishing on a controlled cohort, compromise of a supplier laptop, lateral movement via Active Directory abuse, and a covert pivot toward the SWIFT segment. All actions executed under joint white-team oversight with hard kill-switches.

Measured Outcomes

11 daysfrom initial access to crown-jewel reach
0production transactions impacted
37high-impact findings remediated
+4MITRE ATT&CK techniques newly detected by the SOC
CASE_02
PARTIAL DISCLOSURE

Client Profile

National Power Utility

Region

East Asia

Duration

12 weeks

Scale

Generation + transmission · 40+ substations

Engagement

Security Assessment for OT (IEC 62443)

IEC 62443NIST SP 800-82r3Passive Protocol AnalysisOT Incident Response

Safety-first OT visibility across a national-grid operator under active threat-actor interest.

Challenge

After regional incidents targeting energy operators, the utility needed an honest baseline of cyber-physical risk across SCADA, DCS and substation automation — without ever putting plant safety or grid stability at risk.

Approach

Three-month assessment combining read-only passive captures (Modbus, DNP3, IEC 61850, OPC-UA), engineering-station configuration review, IT/OT boundary audit, and tabletop exercises with operations crews. All hands-on activity scheduled inside maintenance windows.

Measured Outcomes

1,400+OT assets discovered and classified
9previously unknown IT→OT pivot paths closed
62443 SL-2target maturity defined per zone
0process-side incidents during engagement
AI-generated illustration of a power plant facility
FIELD // CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

From generation sites to transmission grids — securing the systems nations depend on.

AI-generated illustration of a power plant facility

CASE_03
PARTIAL DISCLOSURE

Client Profile

Federal Defense Agency

Region

North America

Duration

9 months

Scale

Multi-classified network · 12,000 personnel

Engagement

NIST 2.0 + CMMC L2 Continuous Compliance

NIST 2.0 / CMMC L2Policy-as-CodeEvidence AutomationContinuous ATO

Replacing a binder-driven audit cycle with a continuously-evidenced compliance fabric.

Challenge

The agency was burning thousands of staff-hours per cycle on manual evidence collection across overlapping FISMA, NIST 800-53, and CMMC obligations — with mounting findings on control drift between audits.

Approach

Mapped controls into a single canonical catalogue, instrumented infrastructure with policy-as-code (OPA, Checkov), automated evidence capture into an immutable store, and stood up a real-time control-health dashboard for both engineering and the IG.

Measured Outcomes

−87%manual audit-prep effort
100%in-scope controls under continuous evidence
< 24hdrift detection on critical controls
0open POA&Ms against automated controls at next assessment
CASE_04
DECLASSIFIED

Client Profile

Multinational Industrial Manufacturer

Region

Europe

Duration

12 months

Scale

200+ engineering teams · 14 product lines

Engagement

Secure SDLC by Design (BSIMM-aligned)

BSIMMSAST / DAST / SCAThreat ModellingSecurity Champions

Embedding security into a 200-team engineering org without slowing delivery.

Challenge

A two-year vulnerability backlog, unclear ownership, and an engineering culture that treated AppSec as a release-day blocker. Leadership wanted measurable improvement inside one year — without adding gating that would push teams to bypass.

Approach

BSIMM diagnostic, threat modelling cadence in sprint rituals, SAST / SCA / IaC / secrets scanning wired into PR gates with severity-based blocking, a Security Champions program across all 14 product lines, and an executive scorecard surfacing vulnerability burndown by line.

Measured Outcomes

−63%high/critical vulnerability density (12 mo)
−41%mean time to remediate
1.8×deploy frequency on participating teams
180+Security Champions trained
AI-generated illustration of a banking data center
FIELD // SOVEREIGN MANDATE

Where federal mandates, classified workloads, and national security converge.

AI-generated illustration of a banking data center

CASE_05
PARTIAL DISCLOSURE

Client Profile

National Telecommunications Group

Region

Southeast Asia

Duration

8 months

Scale

5G core + ≈ 70M subscribers

Engagement

Orchestrated Defense Fabrics — Tool Sprawl Remediation

XDR OrchestrationSOAR PlaybooksData FabricSOC Operating Model

Collapsing 28 disconnected security tools into a single coherent defense fabric.

Challenge

Years of tactical procurement had produced 28 partially-overlapping security products generating ≈ 4M alerts/day, with analysts triaging less than 9% of them. SOC fatigue was driving high attrition.

Approach

Inventoried the toolchain, designed a unified data fabric with normalised telemetry, built SOAR playbooks for the top 12 alert classes, retired or consolidated 11 tools, and rebuilt the SOC operating model around a tier-less analyst pod structure.

Measured Outcomes

−68%alert volume reaching analysts
−74%MTTR on P1 incidents
11tools retired · 6 contracts re-negotiated
+2.3×analyst retention vs prior 12 months
CASE_06
ONGOING

Client Profile

Global Investment Bank

Region

North America + EMEA

Duration

7 months

Scale

Tier-1 capital markets · 8 trading floors

Engagement

DevSecOps + Continuous Compliance

SLSA L3Sigstore / CosignHardened RunnersContinuous Compliance

Hardening the trading-platform pipeline without adding a single second to release latency.

Challenge

Regulators across two jurisdictions were sharpening expectations on software supply chain integrity for trading systems. The bank needed evidence — not a policy document — and could not tolerate added release latency on time-sensitive trading code.

Approach

Re-architected the build pipeline with provenance attestations (SLSA L3-aligned), signed artefacts, isolated build runners, and break-glass review only for high-impact components. Compliance evidence emitted directly from the pipeline into the audit store.

Measured Outcomes

SLSA L3achieved on critical trading services
0 msadded to median release latency
100%production artefacts cryptographically signed
−92%manual audit evidence requests
AI-generated illustration of a power plant facility
AI-generated illustration of a banking facility

The people on the front line

Results delivered by real operators

Behind every outcome is an analyst who refused to blink.

Initiate Your Engagement

Your case study,
written in measurable outcomes.

Initiate Contact