Alexa Cybersecurity
Field Record / Customer Stories

Case Studies.

Explore our featured PG Bank data protection implementation and selected anonymised engagement narratives. See how technical delivery, operational discipline and business context come together in practice.

Read the PG Bank customer story →
ENGAGEMENTS60+
SECTORS8
REGIONS12
AVG MTTR REDUCTION−72%

DISCLOSURE PROTOCOLThe featured PG Bank story is a named summary of the supplied implementation report. Personal identifiers, internal destinations and detailed security configurations are omitted. Other narratives on this page are anonymised and generalised; their metrics should not be attributed to PG Bank.

Featured customer storyPG Bank · Vietnam · Banking

PG Bank makes sensitive data movement visible with Cyberhaven DLP

How Alexa Cybersecurity helped a Vietnamese bank establish an operational data protection program across endpoints, cloud collaboration and generative AI workflows.

Endpoint coverage · figure withheld
XX%
Sensitive datasets · count withheld
XX
Cloud integrations · count withheld
XX
Risk events · volume withheld
XXXX

Sensitive operational figures and calendar dates are intentionally masked for customer confidentiality. X placeholders do not indicate the magnitude or number of digits in the original values. Detected events are not a count of breaches prevented.

Implementation Timeline

Approximately 30 days

An estimated implementation period covering preparation, deployment, policy configuration, cloud integration and initial operational handover. This approximate duration is based on the delivery team’s recollection, not a verified start-to-finish schedule in the implementation report. Exact calendar dates remain confidential. Ongoing tuning and follow-up remediation continued beyond the initial implementation.

Protecting sensitive data without disconnecting the business

For a bank, sensitive data is not confined to a single application. It moves through documents, spreadsheets, email conversations, collaboration platforms and everyday employee workflows. A useful data protection program must understand that movement while allowing legitimate banking activity to continue.

PG Bank, a bank in Vietnam, engaged Alexa Cybersecurity to implement Cyberhaven Data Loss Prevention. The engagement combined endpoint deployment, sensitive data classification, policy configuration, cloud integration and operational tuning. The objective was to turn previously difficult-to-observe data movement into an operational capability that the bank could monitor, investigate and progressively govern.

The implementation report describes a successfully established DLP operation across the deployed estate. An initial monitoring period provided a practical baseline for understanding how employees handled sensitive information and where additional guidance or stronger controls were needed. Reporting dates and deployment milestones are withheld for confidentiality.

From a deployment plan to an operating capability

The engagement covered an agreed workstation estate, with scope and installation counts withheld in this public account. Alexa prepared standardized installation packages and scripts, automated deployment through Group Policy and supplied installation guidance for the bank’s operations team. Cyberhaven sensors established monitoring across the deployed estate, with the exact coverage percentage kept confidential.

Coverage was treated as a measurable delivery outcome, not a claim of universal protection. Remaining endpoints required compatibility remediation or follow-up installation. These items were retained in the operational improvement plan rather than excluded from the denominator.

The delivery sequence moved from preparation and packaging to classification, policies and dashboards, cloud integration, and ongoing refinement. This gave the bank a structured path from technical installation to day-to-day ownership. Successful delivery therefore meant more than placing an agent on a device. It meant making the resulting signals understandable and actionable for the people responsible for protecting data.

A shared language for sensitive banking information

DLP becomes useful when its definition of sensitive information reflects the organization it protects. Alexa worked with PG Bank’s risk management function to agree the classification approach and translate approved requirements into a set of sensitive data datasets. The number of configured datasets is withheld.

The team refined the pattern-based detection configuration and handed over the classification documentation. Policies were then mapped to the datasets and their risk levels. This connected technical detection to business priorities rather than treating every document or transfer as equally sensitive.

For security and risk teams, the value of this work was consistency. A common classification foundation made it possible to group observations, assess their relative importance and explain why particular handling activities warranted attention. The bank could build its response process around an agreed data model instead of relying solely on isolated alerts.

Connecting endpoint visibility with cloud collaboration

Cloud collaboration integrations extended the program into the environment where employees create, exchange and reuse business information. The specific service inventory and integration count are withheld in this public account.

Evidence capture was configured for higher-severity policy events, with supporting storage established for investigation material. This was intended to give analysts context when reviewing an alert, including the relevant content and activity, rather than requiring them to interpret an event name in isolation.

Configuration and operational readiness were tracked separately. The report retained vendor follow-up for aspects of evidence display and browser behavior. That distinction matters in a real deployment. Enabling a feature is not the same as confirming that every investigation workflow is fully resolved, and the operating plan reflected that.

Making everyday data movement visible

The monitoring approach addressed data movement through everyday digital workflows, including web activity, email and generative AI. The exact monitoring scope is withheld. These observations showed why a modern banking DLP program must look beyond traditional email attachments. Data can leave a managed workflow through an upload, a web-based utility or a simple copy-and-paste action.

Website activity highlighted the importance of reviewing everyday productivity services and external file-processing workflows. Email monitoring provided a basis for distinguishing legitimate collaboration from activity requiring further review. Generative AI monitoring added visibility into a newer pattern, where employees may submit business content to an external assistant while trying to complete an ordinary task.

The report’s closing summary records risk events detected and classified during the initial monitoring period. Event volumes are withheld. These observations should not be interpreted as prevented breaches, confirmed malicious actions or a count of unique affected records. They provided a baseline for investigation, policy tuning and awareness efforts, rather than a standalone measure of security improvement.

This public case study deliberately excludes user identities, destination-specific findings and incident evidence. The important lesson is the operating capability: the bank gained a way to identify data-handling patterns across established collaboration tools and emerging AI workflows, then decide which actions required intervention.

Introducing controls with business context

Warning policies were activated as part of the phased rollout, with the activation date withheld. Under this approach, users received a warning when an activity matched the configured policy conditions. It created an opportunity to address risky behavior and refine policy decisions while the team assessed operational impact.

Warning mode should not be confused with automatic blocking. At the reporting milestone, stronger blocking for selected critical data categories remained a future assessment item. The implementation established visibility and user-facing intervention; it did not claim that every sensitive transfer was prevented.

Alexa and the bank also reviewed false positives and legitimate business exceptions. The report states that all implemented exceptions followed customer approval. This maintained a distinction between an authorized business need and an informal bypass, while preserving the bank’s authority over the final policy decision.

Operational tuning was part of delivery, not an afterthought. Browser-specific observations were escalated to the vendor, user guidance was provided where appropriate and policy refinements were reviewed against real activity. The goal was a program that employees and analysts could work with, rather than an unmanageable stream of undifferentiated alerts.

A measurable foundation for continued improvement

The engagement established a documented foundation of endpoint monitoring, approved sensitive data classifications, cloud integrations and visibility into data movement. The implementation report supports these delivery and visibility outcomes. Deployment quantities, coverage rates and event totals remain confidential.

For PG Bank, the change was from limited visibility into sensitive data movement to a structured process for observing, classifying and reviewing it. Security and risk teams could work from a shared baseline, users could receive direct policy warnings and business exceptions could be handled through an approval process.

The next stage identified in the report included completing remaining endpoint work, following up vendor issues, reviewing exceptions regularly and assessing stronger enforcement for critical datasets. Monthly reporting, employee awareness and a controlled approach to generative AI were also recommended. These were planned improvements, not additional completed outcomes.

The broader lesson is that effective DLP combines technology with implementation discipline. Endpoint coverage, classification quality, cloud context, user guidance and accountable policy decisions reinforce one another. At PG Bank, Alexa brought these elements together into an operating data protection program with a clear baseline and a defined path for further maturity.

About this case study

Based on the customer-provided Cyberhaven DLP implementation summary for PG Bank. Reporting dates, deployment quantities, coverage rates and event totals are withheld, alongside personal identifiers, internal destinations, detailed exception rules and investigation evidence. It does not assert regulatory certification, complete endpoint coverage or universal blocking.

Discuss your data protection program →
CASE_01
PARTIAL DISCLOSURE

Client Profile

Tier-1 Commercial Bank

Region

Southeast Asia

Duration

6 weeks

Scale

≈ 18M retail customers · 24,000 endpoints

Engagement

Red Team for IT — Assumed Breach

MITRE ATT&CKC2 InfrastructureAD / Entra ID AbusePurple Team Workshop

End-to-end emulation of a state-aligned threat actor against a regional retail bank.

Challenge

Internal audit and regulator both flagged a maturing-but-untested SOC. Leadership wanted irrefutable evidence of how a sophisticated actor would move from initial foothold to core banking systems — without disrupting live transactions.

Approach

Six-week TIBER-EU style operation: OSINT, spear-phishing on a controlled cohort, compromise of a supplier laptop, lateral movement via Active Directory abuse, and a covert pivot toward the SWIFT segment. All actions executed under joint white-team oversight with hard kill-switches.

Measured Outcomes

11 daysfrom initial access to crown-jewel reach
0production transactions impacted
37high-impact findings remediated
+4MITRE ATT&CK techniques newly detected by the SOC
CASE_02
PARTIAL DISCLOSURE

Client Profile

National Power Utility

Region

East Asia

Duration

12 weeks

Scale

Generation + transmission · 40+ substations

Engagement

Security Assessment for OT (IEC 62443)

IEC 62443NIST SP 800-82r3Passive Protocol AnalysisOT Incident Response

Safety-first OT visibility across a national-grid operator under active threat-actor interest.

Challenge

After regional incidents targeting energy operators, the utility needed an honest baseline of cyber-physical risk across SCADA, DCS and substation automation — without ever putting plant safety or grid stability at risk.

Approach

Three-month assessment combining read-only passive captures (Modbus, DNP3, IEC 61850, OPC-UA), engineering-station configuration review, IT/OT boundary audit, and tabletop exercises with operations crews. All hands-on activity scheduled inside maintenance windows.

Measured Outcomes

1,400+OT assets discovered and classified
9previously unknown IT→OT pivot paths closed
62443 SL-2target maturity defined per zone
0process-side incidents during engagement
AI-generated illustration of a power plant facility
FIELD // CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

From generation sites to transmission grids — securing the systems nations depend on.

AI-generated illustration of a power plant facility

CASE_03
PARTIAL DISCLOSURE

Client Profile

Federal Defense Agency

Region

North America

Duration

9 months

Scale

Multi-classified network · 12,000 personnel

Engagement

NIST 2.0 + CMMC L2 Continuous Compliance

NIST 2.0 / CMMC L2Policy-as-CodeEvidence AutomationContinuous ATO

Replacing a binder-driven audit cycle with a continuously-evidenced compliance fabric.

Challenge

The agency was burning thousands of staff-hours per cycle on manual evidence collection across overlapping FISMA, NIST 800-53, and CMMC obligations — with mounting findings on control drift between audits.

Approach

Mapped controls into a single canonical catalogue, instrumented infrastructure with policy-as-code (OPA, Checkov), automated evidence capture into an immutable store, and stood up a real-time control-health dashboard for both engineering and the IG.

Measured Outcomes

−87%manual audit-prep effort
100%in-scope controls under continuous evidence
< 24hdrift detection on critical controls
0open POA&Ms against automated controls at next assessment
CASE_04
DECLASSIFIED

Client Profile

Multinational Industrial Manufacturer

Region

Europe

Duration

12 months

Scale

200+ engineering teams · 14 product lines

Engagement

Secure SDLC by Design (BSIMM-aligned)

BSIMMSAST / DAST / SCAThreat ModellingSecurity Champions

Embedding security into a 200-team engineering org without slowing delivery.

Challenge

A two-year vulnerability backlog, unclear ownership, and an engineering culture that treated AppSec as a release-day blocker. Leadership wanted measurable improvement inside one year — without adding gating that would push teams to bypass.

Approach

BSIMM diagnostic, threat modelling cadence in sprint rituals, SAST / SCA / IaC / secrets scanning wired into PR gates with severity-based blocking, a Security Champions program across all 14 product lines, and an executive scorecard surfacing vulnerability burndown by line.

Measured Outcomes

−63%high/critical vulnerability density (12 mo)
−41%mean time to remediate
1.8×deploy frequency on participating teams
180+Security Champions trained
AI-generated illustration of a banking data center
FIELD // SOVEREIGN MANDATE

Where federal mandates, classified workloads, and national security converge.

AI-generated illustration of a banking data center

CASE_05
PARTIAL DISCLOSURE

Client Profile

National Telecommunications Group

Region

Southeast Asia

Duration

8 months

Scale

5G core + ≈ 70M subscribers

Engagement

Orchestrated Defense Fabrics — Tool Sprawl Remediation

XDR OrchestrationSOAR PlaybooksData FabricSOC Operating Model

Collapsing 28 disconnected security tools into a single coherent defense fabric.

Challenge

Years of tactical procurement had produced 28 partially-overlapping security products generating ≈ 4M alerts/day, with analysts triaging less than 9% of them. SOC fatigue was driving high attrition.

Approach

Inventoried the toolchain, designed a unified data fabric with normalised telemetry, built SOAR playbooks for the top 12 alert classes, retired or consolidated 11 tools, and rebuilt the SOC operating model around a tier-less analyst pod structure.

Measured Outcomes

−68%alert volume reaching analysts
−74%MTTR on P1 incidents
11tools retired · 6 contracts re-negotiated
+2.3×analyst retention vs prior 12 months
CASE_06
ONGOING

Client Profile

Global Investment Bank

Region

North America + EMEA

Duration

7 months

Scale

Tier-1 capital markets · 8 trading floors

Engagement

DevSecOps + Continuous Compliance

SLSA L3Sigstore / CosignHardened RunnersContinuous Compliance

Hardening the trading-platform pipeline without adding a single second to release latency.

Challenge

Regulators across two jurisdictions were sharpening expectations on software supply chain integrity for trading systems. The bank needed evidence — not a policy document — and could not tolerate added release latency on time-sensitive trading code.

Approach

Re-architected the build pipeline with provenance attestations (SLSA L3-aligned), signed artefacts, isolated build runners, and break-glass review only for high-impact components. Compliance evidence emitted directly from the pipeline into the audit store.

Measured Outcomes

SLSA L3achieved on critical trading services
0 msadded to median release latency
100%production artefacts cryptographically signed
−92%manual audit evidence requests
AI-generated illustration of a power plant facility
AI-generated illustration of a banking facility

The people on the front line

Results delivered by real operators

Behind every outcome is an analyst who refused to blink.

Initiate Your Engagement

Your case study,
written in measurable outcomes.

Initiate Contact